SITÉ KÉ AYAT YAT-YIRSUNAM
Do:yi:lok do:yingéko.Lekelok do:yingko.Leke:lo bottané si:lungko dungngai.Édé si:lu:do dortané Sité adorkosin dungngai.Édé si:lu:do bí angu angu Sité kídardém ru:tumpé ila yebodungngai.Bí aipé miga:ru:nékoai.Bím si:lu:dok angu angu símím-péttangété mé:nggésudungai.
Longékolo bík nésin dola dungkodo bottané Pékar píakko(Baduli) dénggo dénggo:la dungngai.Odo Sité tauto –“Ai,no odo íngkoko ila dénggola du:n?Nom agomko tau:pé mé:dung.Édí:lai:kébo tau:pé tau:pé émna mé:la dungngai.Silo nom ríksau:dakso tabítpébong.”Odo Pékar Píagdé tauto-“Ungko agomkon ?sa tautola?”.Sitédé tauto-“No aipé ammem ayat yatjo:dag émna taddung.Émpila ngosin nokkélok ayat yatnamko yat-yirsupé mé:dung”.Odo Pékar Píagdé lukang-“O, agomdé édéye!Agomdé arro.Dépigela ngo édé ayat yatnané montorong kídardém bomgo:la yema:je.Ngok longngém yupko ésíng amíngo:lo:mín mépakla gído.Ngo longngém tu:lalla yubdoje,kapéi ila oletmílo yokpakpéké émna mé:la ngo ísíngo:loi raksa:la lé:do.Nom lagimílo ngo gíla la:bikupé.”Édémpé lugela bí Sité dém luto-“ngok gílatkuma: takamém no so:íng toka:la du:pé lagiye.
Ngo ayat yadnané montoro:dém lomna gíla la:pongkupé”.Édémpé luge:la bí asé:ngo:pé odokké berpaktoku.Sitadé bík agomdém arro émna mí:ngkang.
Odo Sitédé asin ara:bokki lusukang-“Nokkém piné Pékar Píago:pagdé ngom yalladonei!”Édémpé lugela bí aiye émna togésuto odokké oddoi Pékar Píagdé gílatkuma: takampé dakjonna toka:la dungkang.
Longngé gítíkang.Po:lo ésin gítíkang.Édémí:pé dítagé:sin gítíkang.Sitédé odokké gíérma:pé oddí:ng dakjunna dungkang.
Longéko:lo Pékar Píagdé Sitédém yalla gíko amo:do dépatla ka:gnkunamé bí oddíng dakjunna du:do:pé ka:to.Odo Sitédé bím luto-“Nok montoro:dém langkupé déddíkoye adíém lagidoku:n?Ngo so doma: tí:mapé toka:la dakjunna du:ng.”Odo Pékar Píagdé bím luto-“No kinma:nei?Édémí:péyém ayat yaddobon.”Sítadé odo aíém lusukang-“ Bíkkéma:u:piné tu:latla yubné da:di:pagdé ngom silo ayat yatto.Ngokké amírsé bottadaggom ngokké atuksok pinyo:ji:mang.Déma:mílo ngom yalla donéi?” Sitédé annyingki édé agomdém ami: tatkolo lugo:sutokumang.Bí asin dok agomdém asindoi lé:to.
Luyir-Botta:pé ka:la ka:rítsuyoka,ame:pé ka:la ka:títsuyoka.
Its time Mishings get natural justice
(Letter to editor arunachal times)
I appreciate all of those individuals and organisations who opined variety of views on the demand made by Adi Ba:né Kébang’s for recognition of Arunachalee Mishing as Adi tribes.
On the other hand, it is unfortunate and tough to believe that, President of student’s Apex body (AAPSU) of the State for quoting the statements “As per Constitution no tribe can avail ST status in two different states”
The above statement does not confront as per Indian Constitution, for example the Garo tribes are Schedule Tribes in States of Nagaland, Mizoram, Assam and Meghalaya.
Secondly, the gentleman (A citizen) sarcastically flashed news article on 30th April’2012 quoted “who originally happen to hail from Assam”, there is gross misconception or ignorance about origin and inhabitant of various tribes in A.P, the than NEFA or Pro-NEFA period.
Eventually, I advice the ‘Citizen’ please try to know the history of Arunachal Pradesh particularly of Adi villages.
As a matter fact, Adi (Abor) were the torch-bearer in constituting today’s Arunachal Pradesh, starting from forming its first Student Union in A.P. called “Adi-Mishing students Union” with its headquarters at Pasighat in early part of 1947 (now called AAPSU), this is also rightly revealed by AdiSU on April 30 issue.
As per Adi Bane Kebang is concerned, it being highest body within the Adi community, ABK shall never insist a whimsical demand. There must be realistic grounds behind the ABK’s views. ABK has sensibly, genuinely studied and analysed on Mishings with a methodology followed by proper reconciliation base on factual records. The possibility of influx does not arise with the mechanism that ABK have and accordingly the issue have urge before the State’s high level authorities.
Thirdly, this Arunachalee Mishings are not only indigenous to Arunachal Pradesh but also showing loyalty by protecting the territory of Arunachal-Assam boundary since the birth of Arunachal Pradesh and unlike the prevailing boundary problem at Likabali, W/Siang and Balijan, Papum Pare districts, since decades and till date there is no any kind of boundary problems in Arunachalee Mishings populated districts, namely Sille- Oyan circle, Gadum E/Siang through Paglam (Dambuk Circle), Lower Dibang valley and to Lekang circle, Lohit District.
As results, they are honestly protecting the territory and maintaining status-quo with its Assam counterpart.
Nevertheless, there exist ample possibilities of influx in and out across border but this Arunachalee Mishings have never crossed or let the Assam Mishings to approach inside A.P for settlement.
It shall be immature and illogical, if anyone designates this people as migrants of Assam or accuse availing of dual citizenship are baseless.
Mishing claiming their existence in the State is not a new chapter, this issue being a backlog issue since creation of Arunachal Pradesh and time and again years after years issue remained unresolved. Now the Govt. of Arunachal needs to address this issue giving natural justice by curbing out an amicable path and eliminate those policies which lead this pocket of peoples into economically backward, resulting disgraceful of being alienated within their own homeland.
To accord the demand of ABK, the Govt. of A.P. or any other tribes / citizen of the State are not going to encompass additional burden, reason is, since the time immemorial, this people have their inherited Land and Properties within the territory of Arunachal Pradesh and they must be protected and delivered their fundamental rights.
Instead of making a genuine and reasonable claim a complex, one should realize in positive means. First and foremost, these peoples are Indian than Arunachalee. There are generations to come and they shall continue to live in their forefather’s land and properties, whether, it is agreed or not is immaterial to those innocent villagers/inhabitants. I personally do not see any other way, rather than accord them as demand made by ABK, which is a realistic solution to provide a natural justice to this demoralized Society of Arunachal Pradesh.
Live and let live,